Activists often cast diverse causes as the moral equivalent of ending slavery, but without a single, slavery‑scale target this rhetoric spreads attention thin and alienates moderates. The 1860 model worked because radicals and moderates shared one overwhelming objective, not a dozen. Movements need prioritization before maximalist moral framing.
— It suggests moral‑absolutist framing without a singular objective degrades coalition capacity and policymaking focus.
Matthew Yglesias
2025.08.25
100% relevant
Yglesias asks, 'In this analogy, what is slavery?' after citing Waleed Shahid’s Radical Republican comparison and AOC’s safe‑seat strategy.
← Back to All Ideas