Sometimes entire academic generations accept implausible claims because social forces within disciplines — prestige, cohort signaling, and unexamined dogma — outweigh direct empirical checks. These fashions create durable fads that can mislead public policy and science even after the original arguments were weak or absent.
— If academic fashions make false claims seem authoritative, public policy, media coverage, and public trust can be distorted for decades.
2026.03.05
100% relevant
The author lists multiple historical examples (logical positivism, behaviorism, eugenics, denial of animal/infant consciousness) as cases where disciplinary consensus formed despite flimsy defense.
← Back to All Ideas