A leading medical group publicly defended maintaining a misleading maternal‑mortality narrative after a coding change, arguing that correcting it would undermine advocacy gains. This shows elite actors sometimes privilege policy momentum over factual clarity, even when the underlying measurement is known to be flawed.
— If institutions openly justify misleading the public to preserve reforms, it erodes trust and invites politicization across health, media, and policy domains.
Alex Tabarrok
2025.12.01
80% relevant
Tabarrok’s example (Thabo Mbeki and Health Minister Manto Tshabalala‑Msimang promoting nutrition over antiretrovirals and dismissing data) parallels the documented pattern where institutional actors prioritize narrative or advocacy over accurate evidence, producing avoidable health harms and distorted public messaging.
2025.10.07
100% relevant
ACOG interim CEO Christopher M. Zahn’s statement dismissing methodological corrections as a setback to 'hard work' on maternal health.
← Back to All Ideas