Agents versus victims in AI adoption

Updated: 2026.05.13 5D ago 1 sources
People sort into two roles when a new AI technology arrives: 'agents' (those with money, skills, and social capital who can wield and benefit from the tool) and 'victims' (those whose lives are disrupted, surveilled, or deskilled by systems controlled by others). This is not just a rhetorical divide but predicts political attitudes, regulatory preferences, and who will lobby for liberalized versus restrictive AI rules. — Framing AI adoption as an agent/victim split clarifies why reactions to AI track class and institutional power and helps target policy (training, safety nets, governance) to where harms concentrate.

Sources

The Decline and Fall of Human Agency
Jeffrey Bilbro 2026.05.13 100% relevant
The article’s use of a late‑March poll showing only people earning >$200k are majority excited about AI, plus its invocation of Socrates and C. S. Lewis to distinguish makers from evaluators, concretely illustrates this agent/victim split.
← Back to all ideas