AI denialism as collective grief

Public dismissal of AI progress (calling it a 'bubble' or 'slop') can operate less as sober assessment and more as a social‑psychological defense — a mass denial phase — against the unsettling prospect that machines may rival or exceed human cognition. Framing skeptics as participants in a grief response explains why emotionally charged, not purely technical, arguments shape coverage and policy. — This reframing matters because it changes how policymakers, regulators, and communicators should respond: technical rebuttals alone won't shift the debate if resistance is psychological and identity‑anchored, so democratic institutions must pair evidence with culturally sensitive engagement to avoid either complacency or overreaction.