Using deep‑learning to derive standardized, high‑quality phenotypes (e.g., retinal pigmentation from fundus photos) removes a key bottleneck in large‑scale GWAS and lets researchers test polygenic selection with phenotypes that are consistent across cohorts. Coupled with explicit demographic covariance models (Qx), AI‑phenotyping can make within‑region selection tests more robust to ancestry confounding.
— If generalized, AI‑derived phenotypes plus strict provenance and structure controls change how we detect recent selection, that will affect public debates about genetic differences, the clinical use of PGS, and standards for reproducible human‑genetics claims.
Razib Khan
2026.01.16
75% relevant
Razib and Piffer discuss deriving phenotypes (pigmentation) from sparse ancient data and detecting selection over time; this maps to the existing notion that new phenotyping and statistical pipelines (including machine‑aided phenotyping) enable detection of historical selection, and highlights the need for robust provenance.
Isegoria
2026.01.09
66% relevant
Worthy’s cross‑species eye‑color database and the Penn State reaction‑time studies are an analogue to the notion of using automated or standardized phenotypes (here eye darkness and measured reaction time) to detect selection or behavioral associations; the article provides an empirical instantiation of the same methodological move discussed in that idea.
Davide Piffer
2026.01.07
100% relevant
Yuan et al. (2026) and its DeepGRP retinal phenotype + Qx/statistical framework as described in the article.
← Back to All Ideas