AI that can generate proofs and computations will not just speed traditional steps; it will change which steps matter, how mathematical work is modularized, and what roles human mathematicians play. That shift means productivity gains will be uneven — some tasks collapse, others (sense‑making, conceptual synthesis, writing coherent explanations) become the new bottlenecks.
— If true, universities, journals, and funders must rethink training, authorship, peer review, and evaluation to accommodate a transformed research production model.
dynomight
2026.11.13
100% relevant
Author's timeline of LLM capability (mid‑2025 to early‑2026), claim of ~50% personal productivity increase, and the 'spaghetti‑code math' vs modular API metaphor illustrate the shift in what parts of the mathematical workflow AI automates versus what remains human.
← Back to all ideas