AI wearables claim your voice

Updated: 2025.10.06 15D ago 1 sources
Viral AI companion gadgets are shipping with terms that let companies collect and train on users’ ambient audio while funneling disputes into forced arbitration. Early units show heavy marketing and weak performance, but the data‑rights template is already in place. — This signals a need for clear rules on consent, data ownership, and arbitration in always‑on AI devices before intimate audio capture becomes the default.

Sources

Testing the Viral AI Necklace That Promises Companionship But Delivers Confusion
msmash 2025.10.06 100% relevant
The $129 AI Friend necklace’s TOS requires San Francisco arbitration and grants permission to collect audio/voice data for AI training despite frequent disconnections and 7–10 second lags.
← Back to All Ideas