The article argues Amazon’s growing cut of seller revenue (roughly 45–51%) and MFN clauses force merchants to increase prices not just on Amazon but across all channels, including their own sites and local stores. Combined with pay‑to‑play placement and self‑preferencing, shoppers pay more even when they don’t buy on Amazon.
— It reframes platform dominance as a system‑wide consumer price inflator, strengthening antitrust and policy arguments that focus on MFNs, junk fees, and self‑preferencing.
EditorDavid
2025.10.05
100% relevant
Doctorow’s claims that Amazon’s fees reach 45–51%, that MFN terms require price parity off‑platform, and the FTC’s antitrust suit citing these practices.
← Back to All Ideas