Jussim proposes a simple equation decomposing the false‑claim rate in psychology into additive parts: unreplicable findings, citations of unreplicable work as true, overclaims from replicable results, ignoring contrary evidence, censorship effects, and outright fabrication. He argues unreplicable results alone run near 50%, making ~75% a plausible overall estimate absent strong counter‑evidence.
— This framework invites more disciplined audits of research claims and cautions journalists, courts, and agencies against treating single studies as facts without multi‑team corroboration.
2025.10.07
100% relevant
Lee Jussim’s 'Equation 1' and ~75% estimate of false claims in the psychology literature, anchored to Gould’s standard for scientific 'facts.'
← Back to All Ideas