Ancestry‑specific polygenic trends

Updated: 2026.04.28 2H ago 1 sources
When researchers plot polygenic scores through deep time, different ancestral components (western hunter‑gatherer, early farmers, Steppe pastoralists) can carry distinct temporal trajectories; modelling a single ancestry‑corrected time slope can therefore remove or distort real evolutionary change tied to those ancestries. The result is a risk that selection scans or historical interpretations will understate or misattribute which groups — and which times — drove change in traits like height or educational‑attainment PGS. — This matters because methodological choices in ancient‑DNA studies shape public and political narratives about human biological change, hereditarian claims, and the meaning of apparent genetic differences across populations and time.

Sources

Did Akbari et al. Correct Away Evolution?
Davide Piffer 2026.04.28 100% relevant
Davide Piffer’s reanalysis of AADR v66 (11,102 ancient samples) and his critique of Akbari et al.’s single ancestry‑corrected time coefficient; specific results show WHG, EEF, and Steppe ancestry components have different PGS time slopes.
← Back to All Ideas