A durable movement of voluntary smartphone/A I abstention (appstinence) is inherently distributional: those who can exit the network without social penalty are wealthy or well‑connected, so mass adoption is blocked by the network costs of isolation. Attempts to scale abstention therefore need institution‑level substitutes (default‑safe platforms, workplace and school norms, or policy backstops) rather than pure personal virtue.
— This reframes debates about 'digital detox' from moralizing individual choices to structural policy: if harm is systemic, remedies must change collective infrastructure and social norms, not simply exhortation.
Louis Elton
2026.01.02
100% relevant
Article examples: gnome‑hatted Lamp Club phone smash events, Nokia 'brick' sales vs 68M smartphone base, failed humane/Rabbit devices, and the author's invocation of the network‑effect as the central barrier.
← Back to All Ideas