Comparing high‑coverage Neanderthal and Denisovan genomes to modern references and to introgressed tracts in present‑day people, the author finds that surviving archaic fragments contribute systematically to polygenic scores: strongly lower scores for educational‑attainment proxies but higher scores for height, with mixed results for extraversion. The deviation from a proportional (neutral) expectation implies post‑admixture sorting — via drift, selection, or linkage — made the archaic contribution nonrandom.
— If introgressed archaic DNA is systematically enriched or depleted for alleles linked to traits of social salience, that changes how scientists and the public should interpret genetic differences between groups and informs debates about the social uses (and misuses) of polygenic scores.
Davide Piffer
2026.09.14
100% relevant
Author Davide Piffer compared three Neanderthal (Altai, Chagyrskaya, Vindija) and two Denisovan (Denisova 3, 25) genomes to 1000 Genomes references and scored archaic local‑ancestry tracts; reported archaic‑minus‑modern values such as −9.16 SD for education (Neanderthal aggregate) and +1.10 SD for height.
← Back to all ideas