Treat AI as both a technical system and a cultural artifact by making humanities scholars (history, literature, philosophy, media studies) formal partners in system design, product decisions, and default value choices. The discipline would study the metaphors, narratives, and ethical defaults built into conversational agents and translate that analysis into technical requirements and governance practices.
— If adopted, it would change who shapes AI design (adding humanities institutions), alter default product metaphors (less Pygmalionism), and affect regulation, market design, and social harms tied to anthropomorphized AI.
Nick Hilden
2026.04.01
100% relevant
Nina Beguš’s new book 'Artificial Humanities' and her examples — Siri/ELIZA history, Pygmalion/Frankenstein myths, and market shifts to erotica companions (Replika, character.ai, OpenAI’s moves) — explicitly propose this discipline.
← Back to All Ideas