Mechanization can shrink an occupation not primarily by firing current workers but by removing the pipeline of new entrants and apprentices; historical census evidence for Victorian bootmaking shows large net artisanal declines driven by young men who no longer entered the trade, even as incumbents stayed put and new jobs emerged elsewhere. This reframes technological unemployment as a problem of interrupted career entry and cohort replacement, not only of mass layoffs.
— If true broadly, policy should focus more on preserving entry pathways, apprenticeships and transitions for new cohorts rather than only protecting incumbent jobs.
Tyler Cowen
2026.04.22
100% relevant
Hillary Vipond’s paper (cited in the article) uses 170 million British census records (1851–1911) and finds 152,000 artisanal losses in bootmaking driven by non‑entry while 144,000 new jobs appeared.
← Back to All Ideas