Modern, high‑speed anti‑ship and sea‑launched land‑attack missiles make large, costly warships poor bets in contested littoral areas; navies should favor disperseable, lower‑value missile carriers—expendable aircraft, small missile craft, and distributed sensors—so that losses do not catastrophically concentrate firepower or political risk. Historical cases (Falklands, Iran‑Iraq) and the economics of saturation attacks imply doctrine and procurement change, not just incremental upgrades.
— If adopted, this reframes naval procurement, alliance naval operations, and defense budgets away from capital ships toward distributed, lower‑cost systems—affecting industry, basing, and the political oversight of military spending.
Isegoria
2026.04.15
100% relevant
Direct quote and thesis from the article: “There is no compelling rationale for sending large, expensive, and highly capable warships into contested coastal waters,” with supporting references to ASCM threats, Falklands/1982, and saturation attack risk.
← Back to All Ideas