AVs Evade Tickets by Legal Gap

Updated: 2025.10.04 17D ago 2 sources
A driverless Waymo was stopped for an illegal U‑turn, but police said they could not issue a citation because there was no human driver. Current traffic codes assume a human at the wheel, leaving no clear liable party for routine moving violations by autonomous vehicles. Policymakers may need owner‑of‑record or company liability and updated citation procedures to close the gap. — Without clear ticketing and liability rules, AVs gain de facto immunity for minor infractions, undermining trust and equal enforcement as robotaxis scale.

Sources

CNN Warns Food Delivery Robots 'Are Not Our Friends'
EditorDavid 2025.10.04 63% relevant
Similar to the inability to cite driverless cars, the story highlights that sidewalk robots operate amid unclear standards—'what it means…to be “safe” is not fully understood or standardized'—revealing parallel legal/operational gaps for autonomous systems sharing public right‑of‑way.
'No Driver, No Hands, No Clue': Waymo Pulled Over For Illegal U-turn
msmash 2025.09.29 100% relevant
San Bruno Police Department’s viral post showing a Waymo stopped at a DUI checkpoint and released because 'our citation books don't have a box for "robot".'
← Back to All Ideas