Banning Pleas to Preserve Split Juries

Updated: 2025.09.11 1M ago 2 sources
After the Supreme Court ended non‑unanimous juries in 2020, Louisiana left past split‑jury convictions intact and then passed a law prohibiting prosecutors from using plea deals to revisit them. This closes the last practical route to relief for more than 1,000 mostly Black prisoners convicted under a rule now deemed unconstitutional. The policy elevates finality and court workload concerns over correcting tainted verdicts. — It shows how legislatures can lock in the legacy of unconstitutional practices by curbing prosecutorial discretion, reframing retroactivity as a political choice rather than a purely judicial one.

Sources

After 17 Years, DNA Tied a Man to Her Rape. Under Massachusetts Law, It Was Too Late.
by Willoughby Mariano, WBUR, with additional reporting by Todd Wallack, WBUR 2025.09.11 45% relevant
Both stories show how legislative or procedural rules (Louisiana’s bar on using pleas to revisit unconstitutional split‑jury convictions; Massachusetts’ 15‑year SOL for rape) can foreclose relief even when stronger evidence or new legal standards exist.
An Unconstitutional “Jim Crow Jury” Sent Him to Prison for Life. A New Law Aims to Keep Him There.
by Richard A. Webster, Verite News 2025.08.25 100% relevant
Gov. Jeff Landry signed a law barring prosecutors from brokering plea deals in old split‑jury cases like Lloyd Gray’s.
← Back to All Ideas