Congress appears to be pushing back against an administration proposal to slash federal basic research, with negotiators preserving near‑current NSF and research funding and even projecting modest increases in the 'blue‑sky' category. That shift reflects cross‑party recognition that long‑term innovation, health research and technological edge depend on sustained public R&D.
— A durable, bipartisan commitment to basic research changes the political economy of science policy — it reduces near‑term risk to agency capacity (NSF, NIH, NASA), affects AI and biotech trajectories, and lowers the chance of a politically driven, multi‑year break in U.S. science leadership.
Tyler Cowen
2026.01.11
100% relevant
NYT summary cited by Cowen: the Trump administration proposed cutting NSF from $8.8B to $3.9B, while the Senate package and bipartisan agreement restored funding to about $8.75B and analysts now forecast a possible >2% rise in 'basic research' funding.
← Back to All Ideas