The India–Pakistan clash reportedly unfolded entirely beyond visual range, suggesting that networked sensors and long‑range missiles now dominate outcomes. If Pakistan leveraged Chinese sensor fusion and PL‑15‑class missiles, airframes like Rafale matter less than integrated kill chains. This reframes airpower as a contest of networks and munitions rather than dogfights.
— It implies the U.S.–China balance may hinge on missile reach and battle‑network integration more than platform superiority, shifting procurement and doctrine.
James Kingston
2025.10.16
55% relevant
The article emphasizes that drones, cameras, and satellite links create a sensor‑rich, networked battlespace where standoff munitions and autonomous systems eclipse close combat and massed artillery—echoing the shift from platform dogfights to networks and munitions over airframes.
Isegoria
2025.09.16
70% relevant
The game’s core maxim ('What can be seen can be destroyed') and mechanics that prioritize detection, concealment, and long‑range fires mirror the shift toward beyond‑visual‑range combat driven by networks and sensors highlighted in the India–Pakistan case.
Steve Hsu
2025.06.05
100% relevant
The discussion claims over 100 jets fought BVR, evaluates whether Pakistan fielded Chinese‑enabled sensor fusion, and asks if the PL‑15 outranges Western AAMs.