Cap‑rate math blocks urban housing

Updated: 2026.05.12 6D ago 1 sources
Developers’ required cap rates, driven up by higher interest rates, rising construction and insurance costs, and regulatory risk, can make the market value of a newly built rental far below its construction cost; the result is that rational investors won’t build even when demand exists. Simple numeric examples (e.g., $48M to build vs. $24M valuation at a 5% cap) show why tax abatements alone may be insufficient to spur production. — Explaining housing shortages as a failure of return calculus reframes policy: solve supply not only by zoning but by reducing cost, risk, and financing gaps (insurance, permitting, interest), or by targeted subsidies that change the investor math.

Sources

New York City’s Housing Math Ain’t Mathing
Ramon Maislen 2026.05.12 100% relevant
Article’s worked example: $48M build cost for a 50,000 sq ft, 60‑unit building versus valuations at 4–10% cap rates and listed drivers (interest, inflation, insurance + regulatory risk).
← Back to all ideas