Developers’ required cap rates, driven up by higher interest rates, rising construction and insurance costs, and regulatory risk, can make the market value of a newly built rental far below its construction cost; the result is that rational investors won’t build even when demand exists. Simple numeric examples (e.g., $48M to build vs. $24M valuation at a 5% cap) show why tax abatements alone may be insufficient to spur production.
— Explaining housing shortages as a failure of return calculus reframes policy: solve supply not only by zoning but by reducing cost, risk, and financing gaps (insurance, permitting, interest), or by targeted subsidies that change the investor math.
Ramon Maislen
2026.05.12
100% relevant
Article’s worked example: $48M build cost for a 50,000 sq ft, 60‑unit building versus valuations at 4–10% cap rates and listed drivers (interest, inflation, insurance + regulatory risk).
← Back to all ideas