Create small, domain‑respected review committees not to replace authority but to translate decisions into a format experts recognize, making recommendations politically palatable and more likely to be adopted. The tactic both produces substantive technical corrections (a fresh outlook) and functions as a legitimacy buffer—what one leader called appointing a board 'so long as I appoint them.'
— This reframes oversight: committees are a tool of political and technical governance for eliciting candid expert input while managing perceptions of interference, with direct relevance to agency rulemaking, university reform, and disaster/defense programs.
Isegoria
2025.12.03
100% relevant
General Groves’ account that a review committee made a tangible technical improvement (Rose’s Thin Man insight) and that scientists were 'accustomed to making their views known to similar committees.'
← Back to All Ideas