Compare U.S. States, Not Countries

Updated: 2026.05.04 2H ago 1 sources
Policymakers should prioritize comparisons across U.S. states—using NAEP, state TIMSS/PISA extracts, and longitudinal state-level data—because states share more social, political, and institutional context with each other than with foreign nations. State comparisons reveal which state policies and reforms actually produced gains and are therefore more portable than importing foreign models. — Shifting the framing from international rankings to state‑level success stories changes who policymakers emulate and can reduce misguided one‑size‑fits‑all national reforms based on incomparable foreign contexts.

Sources

Bringing it back home: Why state comparisons are more useful than international comparisons for improving U.S. education policy | Economic Policy Institute
2026.05.04 100% relevant
Authors Martin Carnoy, Emma García and Tatiana Khavenson use 2011 TIMSS, 2012 PISA and multiple NAEP years to show substantive state gains and argue lessons from high-performing U.S. states are more applicable than lessons from top PISA countries.
← Back to All Ideas