The article argues environmental protection should be reclaimed by conservatives on pragmatic grounds: target high‑impact problems with cost‑effective tools instead of litigation‑heavy, conflict‑maximizing regulation. It supports this with forgotten history—Reagan’s pro‑environment language and National Review’s early defense of the Endangered Species Act—suggesting a viable, non‑progressive environmental tradition to build on.
— Reviving a non‑progressive, cost‑conscious environmentalism could realign coalition politics and unlock stalled permitting and conservation reforms.
Colin Dueck
2026.01.09
46% relevant
Both pieces trace how conservative currents can reconfigure policy domains once they accept new strategic premises: here Cash shows Right‑of‑center journals moved from isolationism to hawkish containment after 1949, analogous to the existing idea’s claim that conservatives can pragmatically reclaim policy portfolios (albeit in environment rather than foreign policy). The article furnishes historical actors (The Freeman, Herbert Hoover, Taft’s turn) that exemplify conservative policy reorientation.
Matthew Yglesias
2026.01.08
88% relevant
Yglesias echoes the core claim of that idea: treat environmental protection as pragmatic problem‑solving rather than adversarial extraction of industry. He explicitly recommends the kind of cost‑effective, targeted interventions and state‑industry bargains (Norway/Canada/Mexico analogies) the existing idea proposes, arguing Democrats should pursue technological and regulatory leverage rather than supply‑side suppression.
Matthew Yglesias
2026.01.06
48% relevant
Although that idea is about conservative reclamation of pragmatic policy, the article illustrates the mirror phenomenon—an ideological faction (progressives) adopting pragmatic, targeted governing tactics (service delivery, crime posture, YIMBY outreach); the connection is a shared pattern of ideology‑to‑pragmatism pivot when in power.
Robert VerBruggen
2025.12.01
87% relevant
The City Journal/Manhattan Institute essay (author Robert VerBruggen) advances a technology‑first, cost‑effectiveness approach to environmental problems—precisely the conservative/pragmatic frame in the existing idea that argues to target high‑impact problems with market‑friendly tools rather than litigation‑heavy regulation.
Richard Morrison
2025.10.08
78% relevant
The article argues the anti‑elite political turn can 'defang' radical environmentalism and explicitly points to groups like PERC, American Conservation Coalition, and Breakthrough Institute as models for a pragmatic, non‑progressive environmentalism.
Steven F. Hayward
2025.10.01
100% relevant
Steven Hayward highlights Reagan’s 1970 address, National Review’s stance on the ESA, and Newsom’s pressure to loosen CEQA as evidence for a post‑litigation environmentalism.