A refinement within Straussian thought: interpret the Declaration’s abstract phrases (e.g., 'all men are created equal') as principles that require cultural, character‑based context to be intelligible and operational, rather than as self‑sufficient political formulas. This avoids anachronistic reductions (reading Lincoln as the final interpreter) while preserving the Declaration’s normative force.
— If adopted by influential conservative intellectuals, this turn reduces a binary culture‑war framing (abstract universalism vs. particularist tradition), potentially lowering some polarization over constitutional interpretation and shaping how civic education, legal rhetoric, and policy are justified.
Bruce P. Frohnen
2026.01.05
100% relevant
Matthew Spalding’s book (per the review) explicitly pushes West‑Coast Straussianism away from anachronistic, single‑principle readings and toward a method that ties abstract claims to civic character and historical practice (review cites Jaffa, Lincoln, Spalding).
← Back to All Ideas