Continuity of Care in Disputes

Updated: 2025.12.01 5D ago 2 sources
Major insurers are preparing to terminate cancer centers from networks while patients are actively in treatment to gain leverage in contract negotiations. Evidence shows care disruptions worsen outcomes, and disputes are increasingly failing to resolve on time. States are beginning to propose laws requiring insurers to maintain coverage continuity during talks and until treatment concludes. — This reframes insurer–provider bargaining as a patient‑safety problem and points to model legislation to protect patients during corporate standoffs.

Sources

When an adopted baby is born an addict
Rosie Lewis 2025.12.01 66% relevant
Both pieces document how institutional decisions and system frictions (insurer/provider contract breakdowns in the existing idea; returns‑to‑care and inadequate post‑adoption support in this article) create discontinuities that harm vulnerable people and amplify downstream costs; the article supplies a family‑level, qualitative counterpart to the systemic continuity problem.
Insurers Are Using Cancer Patients as Leverage
msmash 2025.10.02 100% relevant
Memorial Sloan Kettering says Anthem and UnitedHealthcare issued termination notices mid‑treatment; FTI found 45% of 133 2024 disputes missed timely agreements; New York introduced a bill to require continued coverage during negotiations.
← Back to All Ideas