Bollywood stars Abhishek Bachchan and Aishwarya Rai Bachchan are suing to remove AI deepfakes and to make YouTube/Google ensure those videos aren’t used to train other AI models. This asks judges to impose duties that reach beyond content takedown into how platforms permit dataset reuse. It would create a legal curb on AI training pipelines sourced from platform uploads.
— If courts mandate platform safeguards against training on infringing deepfakes, it could redefine data rights, platform liability, and AI model training worldwide.
BeauHD
2025.12.04
85% relevant
Both items concern courts imposing limits on how platforms use and supply data for AI models; this Reuters story shows a court forcing disclosure of model interaction logs—precisely the sort of judicial intervention that would constrain training/data pipelines and create duties around dataset provenance and reuse discussed in the existing idea.
BeauHD
2025.12.02
78% relevant
Both items describe courts being asked to impose duties on digital intermediaries that reach into operational practices: the deepfake idea involves judges potentially limiting platform dataset use and training, and the Cox case asks whether courts may impose shutdown or damages obligations on ISPs based on users’ illicit uploads—each would redefine platform/ISP obligations and liability exposure.
BeauHD
2025.12.02
60% relevant
The Flock story implicates the legality and control of training datasets (sensitive US footage annotated by overseas workers); this connects to the legal debate over whether courts can or should limit how platforms’ uploads are used to train AI models and who can access or annotate such content.
Stone Washington
2025.12.01
70% relevant
Both pieces show courts and adjudicative regimes reshaping the rules that govern powerful modern institutions: the deepfake item describes courts imposing limits on platform training/data, while this article documents non‑Article III adjudication that effectively creates an internal judicial regime for agencies—a parallel concern about who adjudicates and how legal authority is exercised (actor: ALJs; evidence: PLF report of 960 ALJs/42 agencies).
EditorDavid
2025.11.29
95% relevant
The article reports record‑label takedowns and industry legal pressure that mirror the wider litigation strategy described in that idea: labels and rights organizations are using takedowns, chart withholding, and lawsuits to limit AI models trained on copyrighted sound recordings (here Suno) and to block releases that imitate living artists (Jorja Smith / The Orchard notices).
msmash
2025.10.01
100% relevant
Their September 6 court filings seek an order that YouTube content policies prevent deepfake videos from training third‑party AI models.