U.S. federal courts are shifting to allow American victims to bring civil claims against foreign organizations (like the PLO/Palestinian Authority) for attacks abroad after the Supreme Court clarified that the Fifth Amendment, not the Fourteenth, governs federal jurisdiction in these cases. That doctrinal correction lets Congress authorize personal jurisdiction over foreign actors who maintain U.S. ties (diplomatic presence, payments) and opens the door to enforcing large anti‑terror judgments in U.S. courts.
— This matters because it changes who can be held financially and reputationally accountable in U.S. courts for transnational political violence and reshapes the legal tools available for victims, states, and sanctions policy.
Tal Fortgang
2026.04.20
100% relevant
Event: Second Circuit reinstated the full Sokolow v. PLO judgment after the Supreme Court’s Fuld v. PLO decision affirming Congress’s latitude under the Fifth Amendment to authorize jurisdiction over the PLO/PA (citing diplomatic presence and payments to terrorists).
← Back to All Ideas