Courts Impose AI Verification Duty

Updated: 2025.10.14 7D ago 2 sources
A California appellate court fined a lawyer $10,000 for filing AI‑fabricated case citations and published a warning that attorneys must personally read and verify every cited source, regardless of AI use. In parallel, the state’s Judicial Council ordered courts to ban or adopt AI policies by Dec. 15, and the Bar is weighing code changes. Together, these moves formalize a duty of verification for AI‑assisted legal work. — By turning AI use into an explicit professional obligation, courts are setting a model for how other professions will regulate AI and assign liability.

Sources

Lawyer Caught Using AI While Explaining to Court Why He Used AI
msmash 2025.10.14 82% relevant
Judge Joel Cohen sanctioned attorney Michael Fourte’s office for submitting AI‑fabricated citations in a summary‑judgment brief and again in the sanctions opposition, directly reinforcing the judiciary’s expectation that lawyers must personally verify AI‑assisted work.
California Issues Historic Fine Over Lawyer's ChatGPT Fabrications
BeauHD 2025.09.22 100% relevant
The 2nd District Court of Appeal’s opinion: 21 of 23 quotes were fake and 'no paper filed in any court should contain any citations' not personally verified.
← Back to All Ideas