With federal wind/solar credits sunsetting under the One Big Beautiful Bill, states are racing to fast‑track permits to meet a 'break ground by July 4, 2026' clock. But transmission additions lag, so deadline‑driven financing risks prioritizing projects that can start fast over those the grid can actually absorb. The result can be stranded pipelines and lost capacity when timelines, not system needs, drive choices.
— It highlights how incentive design and hard cutoffs can misallocate scarce build capacity and undercut decarbonization unless paired with grid expansion.
msmash
2026.01.16
45% relevant
The article documents how long‑running project timetables and ballot‑driven funding (2008/2016 measures) interact with modern cost and labour pressures to produce major schedule slippage and budget gaps—analogous to how hard deadlines in energy tax credits distort permitting and fast‑track builds; both reveal how design of fiscal incentives and deadlines can misallocate build capacity.
Halina Bennet
2026.01.14
82% relevant
Both the article and this idea emphasize how policy timing and design (energy standards, credit/credit‑timing) can misallocate construction and investment. Slow or stringent energy rules serve as a regulatory 'deadline' that raises costs for housing producers (especially manufactured housing), mirroring how tax‑credit sunsets skew energy project selection.
Judge Glock
2026.01.06
72% relevant
City Journal cites Dominion’s $220 billion compliance cost under Virginia’s Clean Economy Act and highlights how adding storage and other mandates increases ratepayer bills; this echoes the idea that policy timing and hard mandates (credit/mandate deadlines) can distort project choice and raise costs for consumers and the grid.
Tony Schick
2025.12.30
68% relevant
The ProPublica story shows legislative paralysis and the need for executive ordering and state payments to unblock projects — similar to the critique that incentive design and timing (e.g., tax credits) can distort which projects get built and when, creating rushed or misaligned grid investments.
Molly Glick
2025.12.03
61% relevant
The Nautilus piece flags timing, financing, and policy‑driven rushes as risks for big energy projects; this echoes the existing idea that hard incentive deadlines can misalign project sequencing (generation vs transmission) and create fragile buildouts—here applied to nuclear permitting and multi‑decade construction windows.
by Monica Samayoa, Oregon Public Broadcasting
2025.10.08
100% relevant
Gov. Tina Kotek’s order to take 'any and all steps' to accelerate permitting so 11 Oregon projects don’t miss expiring ITC/PTC credits despite advocates warning transmission is the true obstacle.