Crop Insurance Traps Floodplain Farmers

Updated: 2025.09.05 1M ago 2 sources
In high‑risk places like Alexander County, Illinois, federal crop insurance and commodity supports cushion repeated losses, encouraging farmers to keep planting land that floods or droughts out. Programs meant to help them retire or convert acreage are small, slow, and staff‑starved, so families sow 'futile' fields to stay solvent. Recent budget choices reportedly expanded farm support while cutting staff who manage exit programs, deepening the trap. — It reframes climate adaptation in agriculture as an incentive‑design and governance problem, not just a funding or technology issue.

Sources

The Floods Kept Coming. He Needed to Grow a Crop That Would Thrive in Water — or to Quit.
by Julia Rendleman for ProPublica, Molly Parker, Capitol News Illinois, and Lylee Gibbs, Saluki Local Reporting Lab 2025.09.05 90% relevant
The article profiles Alexander County, Illinois, where repeated flooding pushed Blake Gerard to switch to rice, but emphasizes that federal farm policy focused on corn/soy (insurance and supports) makes such adaptation improbable—echoing how subsidies keep farmers planting in risky floodplains instead of switching or exiting.
The Federal Farm Policy Trap: Why Some Farmers Are Stuck Raising Crops That No Longer Thrive
by Molly Parker, Capitol News Illinois, Julia Rendleman for ProPublica and Lylee Gibbs, Saluki Local Reporting Lab 2025.09.04 100% relevant
Dogtooth Bend farmers planting after the 2019 flood to qualify for subsidized insurance, alongside Trump‑era expansion of supports and staffing cuts for land‑retirement programs.
← Back to All Ideas