Reformers often slash headcount while leaving the same rules and processes in place, which just reduces capacity to do the same workload. Sequencing matters: reduce procedural and regulatory burdens first, then resize staff to the lighter mission. Zubok’s account shows misordered liberalization can trigger looting, and the article applies that lesson to U.S. deregulatory efforts.
— This gives policymakers a concrete reform heuristic that can spell the difference between improved state capacity and hollowed‑out failure.
Neal McCluskey
2025.08.26
70% relevant
The administration cut nearly half of Education’s workforce while ordering 'uninterrupted' services, leaving Congressionally mandated programs in place—an example of shrinking headcount without changing the rulebound workload.
Santi Ruiz
2025.08.15
100% relevant
The author’s DOGE example of post‑election headcount cuts preceding deregulation, and Zubok’s critique of loosening capital flows before internal market and currency stabilization.
Santi Ruiz
2025.07.31
60% relevant
The piece criticizes abrupt political cuts that 'axed the most effective and efficient programs' rather than reforming processes, illustrating misordered reform that reduces capacity without fixing the underlying rules.