There are two analytically distinct ways to talk about propaganda: as a concept that needs a precise moral/semantic definition (the philosopher's project), or as a social technology with measurable functions and effects (the sociologist’s project). Confusing the two leads to category errors in research, policy, and public debate.
— Recognizing this split changes how we legislate, regulate platforms, assess media harms, and design counter‑propaganda — because regulation tied to a vague 'definition' will miss the sociological mechanisms actually shaping opinion.
2026.04.04
100% relevant
McKenna’s reading of Lippmann (stereotypes and epistemic limits), Bernays (engineering consent), and Ellul (dystopian functions) illustrates the two approaches and their practical consequences.
← Back to All Ideas