Delphi Clears Teen‑Tech Disagreement

A large, transparent Delphi process can convert a polarized debate over adolescent smartphone and social‑media harms into fine‑grained areas of agreement and persistent disagreement, backed by citations and structured statements. By documenting rounds of revision and supplying supplemental evidence, such a process makes expert judgment usable for policy and research prioritization. — If adopted more often, large Delphi exercises could shorten public confusion, focus funding and regulation on contested causal claims, and raise the evidentiary bar for alarmist or dismissive narratives.