Voters broadly value 'democracy' but disagree on its meaning—some prioritize procedural rules and free elections, others prioritize policy outputs or cultural authority. That definitional split explains why high‑salience events (insurrection, foreign intervention, executive action) produce divergent public reactions and limited cross‑cutting consensus.
— If majorities care about democracy but disagree about what it requires, democratic resilience depends less on single events and more on building shared operational definitions and institutional practices that command cross‑tribal credibility.
Carroll Doherty
2026.01.06
100% relevant
Carroll Doherty’s Argument essay: five years after Jan. 6 he argues the event was superseded in public salience because voters disagree about what defending democracy actually means, an empirical claim about public interpretation of democratic threats.
← Back to All Ideas