Dialogic Doubt Op‑eds

Publishers and columnists convert an author’s internal deliberation into a public transcript—an explicit back‑and‑forth of competing impressions and questions—so readers can watch reasoned uncertainty play out instead of receiving a posture of certainty. The format models epistemic humility, shows how complex judgments are made, and resists the viral binary 'for/against' frame. — If adopted, this practice could reduce polarizing flash judgments, raise public tolerance for nuance, and change how media translate breaking, morally fraught events into policy discussion.