Courts are increasingly ordering Internet infrastructure actors (DNS resolvers and search providers) to implement content blocks, treating them as legally accountable chokepoints rather than neutral pipes. That shifts enforcement from site takedowns and CDN actions to global name‑resolution layers, imposing technical burdens on resolver operators and creating jurisdictionally sliced access for users.
— If judicial practice spreads, DNS-level orders will become a favored, fast enforcement tool that fragments the global internet, concentrates compliance costs on a few operators, and raises cross‑border free‑speech and technical‑sovereignty disputes.
BeauHD
2026.01.08
100% relevant
Paris Judicial Court ordered Google (a global DNS resolver and search operator) to block nineteen domains and accepted a dynamic ARCOM‑verified domain list, explicitly rejecting Google’s subsidiarity argument that Cloudflare/CDN actions should come first.
← Back to All Ideas