Doubling Law of Scientific Progress

Updated: 2026.11.10 2H ago 1 sources
Scientific discovery often delivers a roughly constant increment of progress per doubling of input (people, compute, samples): as effort grows exponentially, incremental gains add linearly while marginal returns shrink. That pattern explains why bigger, better‑resourced science means steady advances but requires exponentially more resources to sustain the same absolute step. — If true, this reframes funding, industrial strategy, and public expectations: steady progress is achievable but costly, so policy must choose whether to scale inputs (and costs) or reprioritize research aims and organization.

Sources

No Limit to Exponentially Diminishing Returns in Science but Returns can Scale Indefinitely
Uncorrelated 2026.11.10 100% relevant
The article compiles empirical cases (Wright‑law style cost declines in manufacturing, GWAS sample doublings increasing PGS R², compute growth vs AI error reduction) as concrete evidence for the doubling→constant‑step claim.
← Back to all ideas