Dual‑Track Iran Endgame Strategy

Updated: 2026.04.14 9H ago 1 sources
Propose and publicly anchor an ambitious list of maximal demands to define what a war‑ending settlement would look like, while simultaneously supporting opposition organizing and communications inside Iran to prepare for regime transition if negotiations fail. The public maximal list functions as a bargaining anchor and a signal of red lines; the parallel opposition support is intended as pragmatic insurance for postwar contingencies. — This framing changes how policymakers and publics judge war success — from battlefield gains alone to whether a coherent, politically viable endgame (both diplomatic and political) was prepared and resourced.

Sources

What’s Next in Iran?
Paul D. Miller 2026.04.14 100% relevant
Paul D. Miller’s essay: a published list of maximal demands (IAEA inspections, missile limits, IRGC disbandment, etc.) plus a proposal to host opposition leaders and supply dissident communications during a tenuous ceasefire.
← Back to All Ideas