Where elites sit left of voters on immigration/crime, proportional representation creates space for new right parties (e.g., AfD) to enter and thrive. In majoritarian systems like the U.S., the same unmet demand tends to be expressed through hostile takeovers of existing parties (e.g., Trump remaking the GOP). Institutional rules thus shape the form, not just the level, of populist expression.
— It links representation gaps to electoral design, guiding party strategy and reform debates about how institutional rules mediate populist surges.
Senay Boztas
2025.09.14
65% relevant
The Netherlands’ proportional system enables multiple right‑populist vehicles (PVV, JA21) but coalition norms isolate them; the article notes every major party (VVD, GL/Labour, CDA) refuses to work with PVV and even JA21 discounts a minority far‑right cabinet, showing PR shapes populist expression and governing feasibility.
Matthew Yglesias
2025.09.04
100% relevant
Yglesias’s summary of Guenther’s Germany charts and his contrast between AfD’s rise under PR and Trump’s GOP takeover in the U.S.
← Back to All Ideas