Quico Toro
2026.05.14
86% relevant
The article documents how RCP8.5—a technical worst‑case scenario—was seized by activists, journalists, and fundraisers as a catastrophic default; that dynamic is exactly what the existing idea calls out as 'elite climate catastrophism' that distorts public understanding and policy priorities (actor: UN scientists mothballing RCP8.5; evidence: thousands of papers and alarmist media narratives cited).