Sometimes powerful institutions intentionally or negligently present misleading accounts because the narrative yields political or organizational benefits (e.g., preserving advocacy momentum or legitimating policy choices). These are not accidental errors or fringe memes but institutional information strategies that shape policy, media attention, and public trust.
— Recognizing elite misinformation reframes remedies from platform moderation to institutional transparency, auditability, and incentives for accurate public communication.
2026.01.05
100% relevant
Matthew Yglesias cites the State Department’s Iraq nuclear intelligence and the ACOG defense of inflated maternal‑mortality messaging as concrete examples of institutional actors perpetuating misleading narratives.
← Back to All Ideas