A current elite moral posture treats skepticism of marriage, self‑discipline, and traditional work ethic as socially virtuous, even when those norms are correlated with upward mobility and social stability for less advantaged people. That taboo makes it politically costly for public institutions (universities, philanthropies, and some policymakers) to explicitly promote family‑stability or personal responsibility as public goods.
— If elite moral signaling discourages institutions from endorsing norms that support mobility and civic cohesion, policy debates over education, welfare, and cultural formation will be systematically distorted.
2026.05.11
100% relevant
The newsletter cites Theodore Dalrymple and a Yale alumnus describing elite university students deriding marriage and self‑control; it pairs that framing with university DEI course‑requirement statistics and a state SGO tax‑credit enrollment by Governor Kathy Hochul.
← Back to all ideas