Large diplomatic compounds can function as physical chokepoints for communications and infrastructure (fiber landings, junctions, surge capacity) that materially alter host‑country data sovereignty and allied intelligence sharing. Approving perimeter, location and infrastructure access for such missions is therefore a strategic decision, not merely a planning or zoning matter.
— Treating embassy siting as an infrastructure‑security decision reframes urban planning debates into allied intelligence, telecoms‑sovereignty and national‑security policy conversations.
Elizabeth Lindley
2026.01.12
100% relevant
The article’s concrete example: a proposed five‑acre Chinese embassy in London planned above sensitive City of London fibre‑optic cabling and to house 200+ staff, which MI5 and former intelligence chiefs have flagged as a strategic risk.
← Back to All Ideas