Trump’s diplomacy is best understood as an extension of his business and property‑empire instincts: transactional, reputation‑focused, and oriented toward turf and deals rather than liberal principles like human rights or institutional rule. This logic can produce policies that look inconsistent to liberal foreign‑policy frameworks — neither classic restraint nor liberal interventionism.
— Framing state action as 'empire‑builder' changes expectations about alliances, coercion, trade, and when the U.S. will use force, shifting debates from ideology to incentives and asset logic.
Daniel McCarthy
2026.03.10
100% relevant
Daniel McCarthy’s piece explicitly links Trump’s approach to his "successful career building empires of land and brand," using that career as the explanatory actor for his foreign‑policy choices.
← Back to All Ideas