Exotic regimes as left symbols

When domestic constituencies disappoint, certain left‑intellectual and activist cohorts adopt foreign, charismatic regimes as symbolic models or status objects. That choice functions less as careful policy analysis and more as identity/status signaling, which then shapes public reactions to interventions and undermines consistent international‑law principles. — If left‑wing movements routinely treat distant regimes as emblematic substitutes for domestic agency, it will skew foreign‑policy debates, distort accountability for real harms, and change how parties respond to episodes like Maduro’s arrest.