Some large‑scale social experiments function less like raw evidence‑gathering and more like staged interventions whose meaning depends on context, audiences, and institutional approvals. Treating experiments as performative shifts attention from isolated causal estimates to how trials are visible, ethical, and narrativized — which shapes whether results can be generalized or repurposed.
— Reframing experiments as performative forces a rethink of research ethics, IRB power, platform policies, and how governments adopt evidence from trials.
Seeds of Science
2026.05.13
100% relevant
Kevin Munger’s blog argues RCTs can produce airtight, local effects that nonetheless lack generalizability and that IRB rules and online ethics block many field experiments — an example of experiments behaving like staged public performances rather than portable evidence.
← Back to all ideas