Extraction‑First Regime Change Fails

A policy that aims to remove a regime primarily to enable resource extraction (rather than to secure governance or buy local buy‑in) is likely to fail or produce costly mission creep unless accompanied by credible stabilizing forces on the ground. Remote decapitations plus commercial re‑entry create perverse incentives, signal imperialist motives, and risk prolonged instability, leakages to rival powers, and reputational damage. — If this pattern holds, it warns that military or covert removal of regimes to seize resources will not be a cheap shortcut and should reshape how democracies authorize use of force, design post‑action plans, and coordinate with allies.