A district judge issued a preliminary injunction reversing recent changes to the national childhood immunization schedule and blocked appointment and votes of a reconstituted Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. The opinion also explicitly evaluated and rejected the credentials of named scientific experts, signaling courts may now adjudicate which scientists count in administrative decision‑making.
— If judges routinely adjudicate scientific credentials and agency technical judgments, regulatory certainty for public health will erode and the politicization of expertise will intensify.
Chris Bray
2026.03.18
100% relevant
District Court Judge Brian Murphy’s injunction reversing ACIP changes and the opinion’s footnotes disqualifying named experts (e.g., Kirk Milhoan, Catherine Stein) are the concrete event and text that exemplify this trend.
← Back to All Ideas