Foster Care Lowers Later Crime

Updated: 2025.09.16 1M ago 2 sources
Using quasi-random assignment of child-welfare investigators, Jason Baron and Max Gross compare children who were placed in foster care to similar children who stayed with parents. They find placement reduces subsequent criminal involvement, contradicting the common 'foster care-to-prison pipeline' claim. The result suggests the observed correlation is not causal and that removal can be protective in some cases. — It reframes child-welfare and crime policy by replacing a powerful slogan with causal evidence that points toward when removal may improve public safety and life outcomes.

Sources

Protecting Kids in Foster Care Requires a Bigger, Better-Trained Workforce
Sarah A. Font 2025.09.16 62% relevant
The article directly pushes back on the claim that foster care is worse than remaining at home—highlighting that deaths in foster care are rare and that a widely cited 'foster care is worse' result comes from 1990s Illinois—consistent with evidence that placement can reduce later criminal involvement versus the 'pipeline' narrative.
Round-up: How accurate is self-assessed IQ?
Aporia 2025.09.08 100% relevant
Baron & Gross’s study exploiting investigator assignment to identify the causal effect of foster care placement on later criminal involvement.
← Back to All Ideas